Aspectos ultrassonográficos hemodinâmicos hepáticos e renais em cães com doença degenerativa crônica da válvula mitral
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chronic degenerative mitral valve disease is heart disease more often and one of the causes of heart failure in dogs. The aim of the study was to describe and compare the kidneys, peak systolic velocity, end diastolic velocity, resistive index and pulsatility index of renal and interlobar arteries; and liver dimensions, areas and relationships of the aorta, caudal vena cava and portal vein; volume flow of the portal vein and portal vein congestion index; and resistivity index of the hepatic artery in 19 dogs with chronic degenerative mitral valve disease classified into three groups (B2, C, D) according to the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine (ACVIM). The results showed that the resistivity index and renal pulsatility index increased with disease progression. With regard to liver data, the congestion index increased with the progression of the disease and the volume of portal blood flow showed the same profile observed in other liver diseases such as cirrhosis. The results of this work are complementary in the evaluation of dogs with chronic mitral valve degenerative disease, aiding in the diagnosis and treatment of these animals
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".