Effects of oxidation on residual shear strength of shales within Lea Park Formation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The residual shear strength of Cretaceous Lea Park Formation shale near Lloydminster, Saskatchewan, was evaluated to determine its suitability for road construction. Exposure of these shales results in oxidation, leaching, and other geochemical changes, which may affect the physicochemical forces that control the shear strength behaviour. A laboratory geotechnical testing program was complemented with geochemical testing and modelling. In situ pore-water chemistry and cation-exchange site composition were determined from soil-water extracts using an equilibrium geochemical model. It was found that leaching by low ionic strength recharge removes dissolved and adsorbed sodium from surficial deposits. Sulfur oxidation overprinted the effects of leaching by releasing acidity and sulfate, increasing stored gypsum, and increasing dissolved and adsorbed magnesium. Shear testing indicated higher apparent residual friction angles for surficial samples with lower exchangeable sodium; however, this relationship is obfuscated by the impact of increased sand contents on increased strength. Samples at depth exhibited lower apparent residual friction angles with higher clay fractions and greater exchangeable sodium. Fully assessing the long-term stability of the material would require further laboratory testing, and a theoretical basis to link the geochemical model results to the calculation of physicochemical forces in multi-ion, multi-mineral systems. Qualitatively, it can be concluded that near-surface oxidized and leached shales have greater shear strength, with less risk of this strength changing as a result of post-construction weathering.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".