MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PWE-101 Imaging The Small Bowel In Ulcerative Colitis-relevant Or Still ‘’unclassified”?

2014· article· en· W2484345384 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sukhpreet Singh, Divya Aggarwal, J K Limdi

Bibliographic record

VenueGut · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUlcerative colitisInflammatory bowel diseaseThiopurine methyltransferaseInternal medicineGastroenterologyInfliximabAzathioprineRetrospective cohort studyDiseaseRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction It is widely accepted that Ulcerative Colitis (UC) is a mucosal inflammatory disease confined to the colon. Bolder disease definitions coupled with novel and evolving imaging paradigms have led to more sophisticated small bowel imaging in recent years. Despite this, studies on the relevance and yield of small bowel pathology in UC patients are limited. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of consecutive UC patients seen at our institution between May-October 2013. Clinical data for demographics, disease characteristics, small bowel investigation, endoscopy, treatment and clinical outcomes were obtained from electronic patient records. Results We analysed 321 patients with biopsy confirmed UC [61% male, mean age 53 yrs, range 18–91 yrs]. Mean age of diagnosis was 43 yrs and mean disease duration was 10 yrs. Montreal classification was E1 (14%), E2 (49%) and E3 (37%) respectively. Forty-seven patients had small bowel investigations: MR enterography in 81%, CT enterography in 15% and barium follow-through in 4%. Disease severity at the time of small bowel imaging was mild to moderate in 68% and 32% had severe disease. Thirty-two percent of patients were on thiopurines, 19% on bimodal immunosuppression (infliximab + thiopurine) and 49% were on aminosalicylates. Seven patients had undergone colectomy. Small bowel imaging was reported normal in 46/47 and one patient had distal and terminal ileal disease. Indications for small bowel imaging are shown in Table 1. Subsequent to small bowel imaging, 40% (19/47) had no change in therapy, 43% were escalated to immunosuppressive therapy and 11% underwent surgery for UC. In 3 patients, the diagnosis was changed from UC to Crohn’s disease (2 with perianal Crohn’s; 1 with small bowel Crohn’s based on MRE) all subsequently treated with Anti-TNF therapy. Abstract PWE-101 Table 1 Context of small bowel imaging in ulcerative colitis (n = 47) Context n (%) At the time of disease diagnosis (1st episode; equivocal histology) 7 (15%) Prior to therapy escalation 17 (36%) Gastrointestinal symptoms atypical for UC 9 (19%) Abdominal pain (post-colectomy) 7 (15%) Persistent anaemia 7 (15%) Conclusion The yield of small bowel pathology in our cohort was low, supporting current European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation (ECCO) recommendations. 1 Small bowel imaging in UC meanwhile should be considered in the well-selected patient and driven by the clinical question or diagnostic uncertainty. Reference Dignass A, Eliakim R, Magro F et al . Second European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of ulcerative colitis part 1: definitions and diagnosis. J Crohns Colitis . 2012 Dec;6(10):965–90 Disclosure of Interest None Declared.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.551
Threshold uncertainty score0.463

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGutSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207