MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2484452744 · doi:10.7202/1060694ar

Un bilan du Rapport Parent : vers la démocratisation

2004· article· fr· W2484452744 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Guy Rocher

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin d histoire politique · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Qui dit bilan dit tableau rsum de l'inventaire ou de la comptabilit d'une entreprise, selon la dfinition qu'en donne le dictionnaire. Un bilan comporte donc la prsentation d'un actif et d'un passif, d'un crdit et d'un dbit, c'est;;dire des forces et faiblesses d'une entreprise. Le terme bilan>> est d'ailleurs historiquement driv de balance, avec ses deux plateaux. Et l'on sait que la balance est le symbole de la justice, qu'elle soit humaine ou divine. Un bilan doit donc tre juste, en ce qu'il doit prsenter une situation, un tat des choses, avec le plus de rigueur possible, avec autant d'exactitude que possible; c'est l ce qu'on attend d'un bilan, c'est l'exigence qu'il impo; se. Si une entreprise industrielle dote d'une comptabilit se prte assez bien la production d'un bilan annuel, il est nettement plus prilleux de faire le

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.877
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin d histoire politiqueSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207