MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2484653790 · doi:10.1002/poc.3014

Hartree–Fock and density functional theory study of remote substituent effects on heterolytic Fe–N bond energies of <i>p</i>‐G‐C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>NHFe(CO)<sub>2</sub>(η<sup>5</sup>‐C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>5</sub>) and <i>p</i>‐G‐C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>N(COMe)Fe(CO)<sub>2</sub>(η<sup>5</sup>‐C<sub>5</sub>H<sub>5</sub>)

2012· article· en· W2484653790 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physical Organic Chemistry · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeterolysisChemistrySubstituentCyclopentadienyl complexDensity functional theoryLigand (biochemistry)Bond-dissociation energyDissociation (chemistry)MetalCrystallographyBond energyStereochemistryCatalysisMedicinal chemistryComputational chemistryMoleculePhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The nature and strength of metal–ligand bonds in organotransition‐metal complexes are crucial to the understanding of organometallic reactions and catalysis. Quantum chemical calculations at different levels of theory have been used to investigate heterolytic Fe–N bond energies of para‐substituted anilinyldicarbonyl(η 5 ‐cyclopentadienyl)iron [ p ‐G‐C 6 H 4 NH(η 5 ‐C 5 H 5 )Fe(CO) 2 , abbreviated as p ‐G‐C 6 H 4 NHFp (1), where G = NO 2 , CN, COMe, CO 2 Me, CF 3 , Br, Cl, F, H, Me, MeO, and NMe 2 ] and para‐substituted α‐acetylanilinyldicarbonyl(η 5 ‐cyclopentadienyl)iron [ p ‐G‐C 6 H 4 N(COMe)(η 5 ‐C 5 H 5 )Fe(CO) 2 , abbreviated as p ‐G‐C 6 H 4 N(COMe)Fp (2)] complexes. The results show that BP86 and TPSSTPSS can provide the best price/performance ratio and more accurate predictions in the study of Δ H het (Fe–N)'s. The linear correlations [ r = 0.98 (g, 1a), 0.93 (g, 2b)] between the substituent effects of heterolytic Fe–N bond energies [ΔΔ H het (Fe–N)'s] of series 1 and 2 and the differences of acidic dissociation constants (Δp K a ) of N–H bonds of p ‐G‐C 6 H 4 NH 2 and p ‐G‐C 6 H 4 NH(COMe) imply that the governing structural factors for these bond scissions are similar. And the linear correlations [ r = −0.99 (g, 1c), −0.92 (g, 2d)] between ΔΔ H het (Fe–N)'s and the substituent σ p − constants show that these correlations are in accordance with Hammett linear free energy relationships. The polar effects of these substituents and the basis set effects influence the accuracy of Δ H het (Fe–N)'s. ΔΔ H het (Fe–N)'s(1, 2) follow the captodative principle. ME α‐COMe, para‐G s include the influences of the whole molecules. The correlation of ME α‐COMe, para‐G s with σ p − is excellent. ME α‐COMe, para‐G s rather than ΔΔ H het (Fe–N)'s in series 2 are more suitable indexes for the overall substituent effects on Δ H het (Fe–N)'s(2). Insight from this work may help the design of more effective catalytic processes. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0110.012
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0140.007
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0020.006
Open science0.0050.005
Research integrity0.0040.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it