MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2484662899 · doi:10.2110/sepmsp.105.06

Warm-Vs. Cool-Water Carbonate Factories Andadjacent Slopes

2014· book-chapter· en· W2484662899 on OpenAlexaffabout
Benoı̂t Beauchamp, Candice Victoria Shultz, Kaylee D. Anderson

Bibliographic record

VenueSEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology) eBooks · 2014
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSverdrupPennsylvanianArcticPermianGeologyCarbonateOceanographyPaleontologyStructural basinThe arcticChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Pennsylvanian-Early Permian carbonate factories of the Sverdrup Basin, Arctic Canada, and their adjoining slopes were under warm-tropical conditions in the Bashkirian-Asselian and cool-water warm-temperate conditions in the Artinskian-Kungurian. All other factors being the same, the Sverdrup Basin is a unique laboratory where these two types of slope development can be compared and contrasted. Key differences include high carbonate production, widespread boundstone margin development, shelf-margin storm protection, and early lithification for warm margins, and the lack thereof for cool margins. In addition, slope sedimentation below a shallow lysocline during the cool interval led to extensive carbonate dissolution. As a result, Artinskian-Kungurian middle and lower slopes are dominated by spiculitic chert. The Pennsylvanian-Early Permian succession consists of four third-order unconformity-bounded transgressive-regressive (T-R) sequences driven by episodic tectonics. The regressive systems tracts of each sequence recorded progradation of an accretionary margin at a time of tectonic quiescence. The warm-water accretionary margins had slopes that were either planar or exponential. Steep upper slopes formed the downward extension of a lithified boundstone margin. Strike-discontinuous erosion of that margin led to the shedding of channelized debris in the proximal middle slopes. Grainflows and proximal turbidites accumulated between areas of debris deposition. Distal turbidites forming large strike-continuous aprons were deposited in the distal part of the middle slope. This part of the slope also contains high-amplitude truncation surfaces and slump folds. The lower slope was composed of distal turbidites interstratified with hemipelagic material. The cool-water accretionary margins had sigmoidal slopes. Upper slopes formed the downward extension of a high-energy open shelf. Gravity-aided grain-dominated tempestites were deposited in the upper slope, locally associated with mud mounds. The steeper part of the sigmoidal slope was the middle slope, where key processes included slope failure and extensive sponge spicule production. Grainflow and proximal turbidites accumulated in the proximal portion of the middle slope. Mud-dominated siliceous distal turbidites associated with large-scale truncation surfaces accumulated in the distal part of the middle slope. Distal turbidites interfinger with hemipelagic siliceous shale and fine siltstone in the lower slope.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology) eBooksSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207