Bibliographic record
Abstract
For a fortnight after the capture of Rome there was no effective government in the city, but gradually some form of de facto organization began to evolve, although almost everything remained in total confusion. The army was now officially lodged, Fabrizio Maramaldo and Luigi Gonzaga having command of their Italian forces in Trastevere, the lansquenets in occupation of the Borgo, and the Spaniards on the other side of the Tiber around Campo di Fiori. The armies were broken up in this way in order to prevent them fighting with each other. The Colonna family also played an important part in guarding the city, and with their troops, who were considerably better controlled than those in the imperial army, maintained a defence at the bridge of Sant'Angelo and in the adjacent quarter of the city as well as at Ponte Milvio. The command of the imperial army had, inevitably, been weakened by the death of Bourbon. In the absence of any other obvious successor, Orange had automatically assumed the over-all command, but he was still very young and inexperienced and liable to make mistakes; the first was to appear to favour the lansquenets at the expense of the Spaniards.KeywordsObvious SuccessorItalian ForceImperial SoldieryCivil GovernorImperial AuthorityThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".