MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2484751293 · doi:10.1007/978-81-322-1952-1

Mathematics and Computing 2013

2014· book· en· W2484751293 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSpringer proceedings in mathematics & statistics · 2014
Typebook
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Mining Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSobolev Institute of Mathematics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of SciencesRussian Academy of SciencesInstitute for Infocomm ResearchUniversity of MysoreIndian Institute of Technology GuwahatiIndian Institute of Science Education and Research MohaliIndian Institute of Technology IndoreCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research, IndiaIndian Institute of ScienceIndian Institute of Technology KharagpurIndian Institute of Technology KanpurUniversity of HyderabadUniversité de RouenIndian Institute of Technology DelhiSouth China Normal UniversityIndian Institute of Technology, PatnaUniversidad de GranadaUniversità Politecnica delle MarcheUniversity of Texas at ArlingtonUniversidade de CoimbraJadavpur UniversityNanyang Technological UniversityUniversity of DelhiSungkyunkwan UniversityNational Board for Higher MathematicsTsinghua UniversityHaldia Institute of TechnologyInternational Institute of Information Technology, HyderabadAalborg UniversitetUppsala UniversitetDefence Research and Development OrganisationIndian Institute of Technology MadrasAustralian National UniversityYork UniversityMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyWashington University in St. LouisJawaharlal Nehru UniversityChalmers Tekniska HögskolaConcordia UniversityDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaUniversidad de AlicanteNational University of SingaporeUniversität UlmUniversity of CanterburyAthabasca UniversityUniversity of OklahomaPurdue UniversityMinistry of Communication and Information TechnologyAuburn UniversityUniversity of Central FloridaTata Institute of Fundamental ResearchOstravská Univerzita v OstravěNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and TechnologyPolitechnika WarszawskaHarish-Chandra Research Institute
KeywordsMathematics educationComputer scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.459
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it