MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2484978535 · doi:10.5376/ija.2016.06.0013

Association of <i>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</i> in African Catfish, <i>Clarias gariepinus</i> (Burchell, 1822) Fry Mortalities with Dropsy

2016· article· en· W2484978535 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Thangapalam Jawahar Abraham, Harresh Adikesavalu

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Aquaculture · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInfections and bacterial resistance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClarias gariepinusCatfishStenotrophomonas maltophiliaBiologyPopulationMicrobiologyFisheryMedicineFish <Actinopterygii>Bacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This communication reports the association of S. maltophilia in the mortalities of nursery grown African catfish Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) fries with distended abdomen and its phenotypic characterization. The gross and clinical signs observed in diseased fries were lethargy, body discolouration, mild fin/tail rot, distended abdomen, swelled intestine and other internal organs, and visceral haemorrhages. The abdominal cavity of affected fries was filled with transparent viscous ascites with jelly-like mass. Morbidity and mortality was about 60% and 20-25% of the total population, respectively. The BioMerieux Vitek 2 compact system identified the strains as Stenotrophomonas maltophilia . The strains were positive for protease and lipase activity and exhibited alpha haemolytic on sheep blood agar. Our results suggest that S. maltophilia in emerging as a pathogen of C. gariepinus, which is a serious cause for concern.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of AquacultureSame topicInfections and bacterial resistanceFrench-language works237,207