MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2485064000 · doi:10.3847/2041-8205/827/2/l36

THE CALIFA AND HIPASS CIRCULAR VELOCITY FUNCTION FOR ALL MORPHOLOGICAL GALAXY TYPES

2016· article· en· W2485064000 on OpenAlexafffund
S. Bekeraité, C. J. Walcher, L. Wisotzki, J. Falcón‐Barroso, M. Lyubenova, Danail Obreschkow, S. F. Sánchez, Kristine Spekkens, Paul Torrey, Glenn van de Ven, M. A. Zwaan, Y. Ascasíbar, Joss Bland‐Hawthorn, R. M. González Delgado, B. Husemann, R. A. Marino, Mark Vogelsberger, B. Ziegler

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal Letters · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
FundersDirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoLeibniz-GemeinschaftLeibniz-Institut für Astrophysik PotsdamNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
KeywordsPhysicsGalaxyAstrophysicsGalaxy rotation curvePopulationRADIUSEffective radiusLuminosityStellar populationGalaxy formation and evolutionAstronomyStar formationMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The velocity function (VF) is a fundamental observable statistic of the galaxy population that is similar to the luminosity function in importance, but much more difficult to measure. In this work we present the first directly measured circular VF that is representative between 60 320 km s−1 for galaxies of all morphological types at a given rotation velocity. For the low-mass galaxy population (60 170 km s−1), we use the HI Parkes All Sky Survey VF. For the massive galaxy population (170 320 km s−1), we use stellar circular velocities from the Calar Alto Legacy Integral Field Area Survey (CALIFA). In earlier work we obtained the measurements of circular velocity at the 80% light radius for 226 galaxies and demonstrated that the CALIFA sample can produce volume-corrected galaxy distribution functions. The CALIFA VF includes homogeneous velocity measurements of both late and early-type rotation-supported galaxies and has the crucial advantage of not missing gas-poor massive ellipticals that HI surveys are blind to. We show that both VFs can be combined in a seamless manner, as their ranges of validity overlap. The resulting observed VF is compared to VFs derived from cosmological simulations of the 0 galaxy population. We find that dark-matter-only simulations show a strong mismatch with the observed VF. Hydrodynamic simulations fare better, but still do not fully reproduce observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal LettersSame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207