MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2485159264 · doi:10.1109/itec.2016.7520301

Modeling, parameterization, and state of charge estimation of Li-Ion cells using a circuit model

2016· article· en· W2485159264 on OpenAlexaff
Hamed Afshari, Mina Attari, Ryan Ahmed, Mohamad Farag, Saeid Habibi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEquivalent circuitState of chargeExtended Kalman filterControl theory (sociology)EstimatorParametric statisticsKalman filterEstimation theoryBattery (electricity)VoltageComputer scienceSystem identificationParticle swarm optimizationRC circuitCapacitorAlgorithmEngineeringData modelingMathematicsPower (physics)StatisticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a general procedure applied for modeling, parameter identification, and state of charge (SOC) estimation of a Li-Ion battery cell. The paper explains a battery tester with a number of experiments conducted to investigate the cell physical properties. Dynamics of the Li-Ion cell are modeled using an equivalent circuit model, whereas parameters of the model are calculated using particle swarm optimization. This method minimizes the output error that is the difference between the simulated output from the model and the measured terminal voltage. The provided equivalent circuit model with optimized parameters was used for SOC estimation. Two different state estimation methods have been applied to estimate the cell SOC based on real-time measurements. The estimation methods include the extended Kalman filter (EKF), and the novel smooth variable structure filter (SVSF). The SVSF method was used as it can produce more accurate state estimates for dynamic systems with modeling and parametric uncertainties. This paper compares the performance of these two estimators for real-time SOC estimation using tester data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.492
Threshold uncertainty score0.218

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207