MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2485424703 · doi:10.1057/9780230579538_11

Euroscepticism in Central Europe

2007· book-chapter· en· W2485424703 on OpenAlexaff
Laure Neumayer

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · 2007
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean Union Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpposition (politics)PoliticsNormativePolitical sciencePolitical economyDimension (graph theory)European integrationMember statesSociologyLawEuropean unionInternational tradeEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study of Euroscepticism is one of the main bodies of a larger literature that focuses on the attitudes of political parties towards European integration in old and new member states of the EU.1 Far from being an analytical notion, the term ‘Euroscepticism’ has a strong normative and polemical dimension that qualifies it as a political tool. Moreover, it presents a risk of ‘conceptual stretching’ because it lumps together parties that have various political identities, express diametrically opposed views on European issues, and show different degrees of opposition to the European project. This chapter offers a critical analysis of a category that is simultaneously a buzzword in scholarly literature and a term used to disqualify political opponents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.781
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooksSame topicEuropean Union Policy and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207