MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2485464252 · doi:10.51257/a-v3-c75

Marchés de travaux dans l’Union européenne

2015· article· fr· W2485464252 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Bernard-Michel Bloch

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicInnovation Policy and R&D
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesInstitut de Veille SanitaireInstitut national des sciences de l'UniversMinistère des TransportsMinistère de l'Éducation NationaleMinistère de la SantéInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleInha UniversityInstitut national de recherche en informatique et en automatique (INRIA)Institut National de la Recherche AgronomiqueInstitut de Recherche pour le DéveloppementMinistère de l'Intérieur
KeywordsPolitical sciencePhilosophyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les marchés de travaux, dans l'Union européenne, sont régis essentiellement par deux directives dont la version en vigueur date de 2014. Leur objectif est d'organiser une concurrence équitable entre les entreprises de tous les États membres afin de leur permettre un égal accès aux marchés publics des 28 États membres de l'Union européenne. Le but de l'article est d'offrir aux lecteurs une approche du contexte juridique dans lequel s'inscrivent ces préoccupations qui sont en conformité avec les exigences des Traités européens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0130.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInnovation Policy and R&DFrench-language works237,207