MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2485497874 · doi:10.1145/2851613.2851657

Improving SQL query performance on embedded devices using pre-compilation

2016· article· en· W2485497874 on OpenAlexafffund
Graeme Douglas, Ramon Lawrence

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceSQLMobile deviceOverhead (engineering)Relational databaseDatabaseParsingRelational database management systemEmbedded systemOperating systemProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Embedded devices are increasingly being used for data collection and on-device data analysis for applications in environmental and infrastructure monitoring, health and wearable computing, and sensor and mobile systems. Processing data on the device rather than transmitting it over a network for analysis reduces energy consumption, network bandwidth usage, and results in more robust and longer functioning devices. A key challenge is enabling efficient data management on devices that may only have a few KBs of memory and limited code space. Previous work has demonstrated that using relational databases is possible on embedded devices with restrictions on the queries that can be processed. In this work, we eliminate one of the key barriers to using relational technology on embedded devices, which is the massive overhead involved in SQL parsing and translation that can take up to 50% of the code and memory resources on the device. Our approach allows developers to continue to use relational APIs and SQL during development which are then pre-compiled when deployed on the device. This produces all of the benefits of relational systems without the on-device overhead and limitations. Experimental results demonstrate that query pre-compiling can reduce query parse times by up to 90% and on-device execution times by up to 50%. The technique is applicable to a wide range of embedded systems and databases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCloud Computing and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207