MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2485605499 · doi:10.1503/cjs.006216

Letter to the editor: response to “Surgeon unemployment: Would practice sharing be a viable solution?”

2016· letter· en· W2485605499 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Husein Moloo, Isabelle Raîche, Lara Williams, Fady Balaa

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Surgery · 2016
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDental Education, Practice, Research
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUnemploymentClinical PracticeMedical educationFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We read with great interest the article by Wakeam and Feinberg[1][1] regarding a shared practice model whereby a surgeon who is winding down practice partners with a young surgeon. Does this type of practice model need only apply to a transition into and out of practice? Are there other forms of

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0330.034
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.429
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Surgery→Same topicDental Education, Practice, Research→French-language works237,207→