Reconversion et consécration : trajectoires de musiciens savants et valorisation de la musique populaire brésilienne
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nous comparons ici les crises vocationnelles et les reconversions consécutives des deux compositeurs, solistes et chefs d’orchestre savants Heitor Villa-Lobos et Radamés Gnattali à deux formes différentes de culture de masse : l’éducation nationale et la radiodiffusion publicitaire. La reconfiguration de l’espace musical a suscité chez eux des stratégies de reconversion qui les éloignaient initialement de leurs aspirations initiales. Mais nous montrons comment ces reconversions contribuent à inventer de nouvelles formes de mécénat (par l’État, par la publicité), et qu’outre les conditions de production, elles permettent de mettre en exergue le rôle actif qu’ils ont pu prendre dans la création d’un public et d’une esthétique nouvelle, correspondant à de nouvelles pratiques musicales, partagées sur le territoire. Ces reconversions se sont finalement avérées être l’une des conditions de leur consécration comme producteurs d’oeuvres savantes emblématiques du collectif national.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".