MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2485743558 · doi:10.1520/mnl11426m

Chapter 6: An Overview of On-Line Measurement for Distillation and Vapor Pressure

2008· book-chapter· en· W2485743558 on OpenAlexaff
Alex T. C. Lau, Michael A. Collier

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Sensors
Canadian institutionsImperial Oil (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDistillationProcess engineeringLine (geometry)Vapor pressureEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceComputer scienceChemistryEngineeringChromatographyMathematicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AS WE HAVE SEEN IN PREVIOUS CHAPTERS, THE measurement of distillation and vapor pressure characteristics are vital pieces of information for the classification and volatility property certification of petroleum products. While these measurements are typically conducted under standard laboratory conditions and practices, there also exists a need for measurement of these same parameters under the dynamic conditions encountered during the actual production process of these fuels and other products. This chapter provides a high level, non-technical overview to introduce readers to the subject matter. Measurements under these types of dynamic conditions are generally accomplished through the application of on-line analytical instrumentation systems. These systems are designed to tap, either directly or indirectly, into the process streams contained within a refineries production facility. These systems are generally capable of making continuous or periodic measurements of the distillation or vapor pressure characteristic during the actual dynamic production of the product. This provides for near continuous feedback of information about the volatility characteristics of a product directly to the process plant operators, such that the necessary adjustments to key process parameters can be made in order to have the final product meet the desired (or targeted) volatility properties. In modern day refineries, this process control function is typically carried out through automated control systems based on complex mathematical models of the manufacturing process, with the plant operators acting primarily in a supervisory role and to deal with unexpected disturbances. Last but not least, the on-line measurement system produced results can be used in providing continuous quality control and statistical analysis of the volatility properties of the monitored product stream. The design of these on-line measurement systems is non-trivial. For most applications, the design considerations begin with the process control requirement and objective. Since these systems are intended to operate continuously, unsupervised, and within the production facility, system hardware design must meet specific safety requirements and standards developed through ASTM, ISA, and other industry consortiums.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.129

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.038

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.169
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.125 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnalytical Chemistry and SensorsFrench-language works237,207