Les technologies de communication : d’une sociologie des usages à celle de l’expérience hypermoderne
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article rappelle comment la sociologie des usages des technologies de communication a d’abord, en réhabilitant les usagers dans leur dimension d’acteurs, permis de s’extraire de simples études d’impact des technologies sur le social, puis a conduit, au moins en partie, à une sociologie de l’expérience. À son tour, cette dernière pose concrètement la question de savoir comment et dans quelle mesure, dans un monde où ces technologies irriguent désormais la quasi-totalité de la surface de nos vies, l’individu contemporain en reste encore maître. En particulier, la question de l’autonomie du soi-sujet (réflexif et en retrait) en regard du soi-objet (constamment pisté, calibré et métabolisé en un ensemble d’indicateurs par le biais de ces mêmes technologies) est posée, lançant ainsi à la sociologie le défi de rendre compte de ce qui semble être l’un des enjeux centraux de la société hypermoderne.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.039 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.020 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".