MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2485896065 · doi:10.24201/es.2014v32n96.48

Interrupción y regreso escolar en los jóvenes de la ciudad de México

2014· article· es· W2485896065 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Emilio Blanco

Bibliographic record

VenueEstudios Sociológicos de El Colegio de México · 2014
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Outcomes and Influences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocioeconomic statusQuarter (Canadian coin)MainstreamSociologySocial classRationalityDrop outPsychologySocial psychologyDemographyGeographyDemographic economicsPolitical scienceEconomicsPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El artículo aborda el fenómeno del regreso a la escuela entre los jóvenes de la ciudad de México que interrumpieron sus trayectorias educativas en algún momento entre el inicio de la primaria y el fin del nivel medio superior. Más de una cuarta parte de estos jóvenes experimentaron un evento de regreso, lo que fortalece la idea de que la salida de la escuela no equivale al fin de la trayectoria educativa. Existe una asociación significativa entre el origen socioeconómico y la probabilidad de retorno, aunque más débil (y en sentido inverso) que para la interrupción. Se observa una relación compleja, no lineal, entre el regreso y el momento educativo de la interrupción. También se halló que una proporción significativa de quienes regresaron logró finalizar el nivel medio superior, situación particularmente destacable entre los jóvenes de menor origen social. La evidencia apuntaría a considerar los efectos tanto de la estructura como de la agencia, y específicamente a recuperar la racionalidad de los actores.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.208

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEstudios Sociológicos de El Colegio de MéxicoSame topicEducational Outcomes and InfluencesFrench-language works237,207