La propriété des créances: approche comparative (Ownership of Claims: Comparative Approach)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
French Abstract: La propriete des creances est une notion controversee dans les systemes juridiques romano-germaniques. Pourtant, le mouvement vers la dematerialisation des richesses conduit a envisager l’alliance de la propriete et de la creance, deja reconnue par le biais du langage. Tant l’histoire que l’economie semblent converger vers la reconnaissance de la nature de bien des creances. Admettre cette nature ne suffit plus : encore faut-il en tirer la consequence qui s’impose en termes d’objet de la propriete. C’est ce que semble avoir fait le recent Code civil du Quebec. Tout autant que la propriete materielle, la propriete des creances a vocation a la technicite. Longtemps cachee sous le manteau de la titularite, la propriete des creances n’a pas une nature distincte de celle de la propriete des corps. Simplement, de meme que le regime juridique de la propriete s’adapte aux biens meubles ou immeubles qui en sont l’objet, le regime de la propriete des creances epouse la particularite de l’objet que constitue le bien-creance.English abstract: The question as to whether ownership can bear on claims is a controversial one in Romano Germanic legal systems. Yet the on-going trend towards the dematerialisation of wealth invites legal experts to ally ownership and claims much in the same way in which, in ordinary parlance, people are said to own personal rights. Both history and economics would seem to point to a common recognition of the property nature of claims. Yet acknowledging the possibility that ownership bear on claims is no longer enough. The consequences of viewing the object of ownership as extending beyond material things must be recognized more generally. This is what the recent Civil Code of Quebec appears to have done. Just as the material conception of ownership rests upon a technical infrastructure of the law of property, so too does the extension of ownership to claims require the elaboration of a technical regime. Traditionally obscured by a theory of titularity of rights, ownership as a means for explaining title to claims has the same juridical nature as ownership of things. Simply stated, ownership adapts to the object to which it attaches. Just as ownership can accommodate both movable and immovable property, so too can it be adapted to accommodate the peculiarities of claims as the object upon which it bears.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.020 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".