MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2486021424

Permeability of osteoporotic bone: a microCT study

2013· article· en· W2486021424 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Paul Kroliczek

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of undergraduate research in Alberta · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and osteoporosis research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoporosisX-ray microtomographyBone tissueBone resorptionBone marrowMaterials scienceBone mineralBone remodelingPermeability (electromagnetism)Biomedical engineeringAnatomyMedicineChemistryPathologyRadiologyInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION Osteoporosis is a disease characterized by an increase in bone resorption that leads to decreased bone mineral mass density and a deterioration of bone tissue micro-architecture. These structural changes translate in an increase in bone fragility and fracture risk [1] . Intertrabecular bone marrow plays an important role in bone remodeling, transporting cells, oxygen and nutrients that are critical in biological processes [2] . When studying the role of intertrabecular bone marrow in osteoporosis, one of the important parameters is the trabecular bone permeability. Permeability depends on the tissue porosity and the interconnectivity of the trabeculae, and it can vary according to the anatomic site [3] . Because permeability is related to the microstructure of the trabecular tissue, we hypothesize that it can be quantified using micro computed tomography ( μ CT) images. The objectives of this project are 1) to develop an experimental method to measure permeability using trabecular bone cubes and 2) to correlate the permeability with μ CT morphological outcomes. METHODS Cubic specimens (1cm 3 ) of trabecular bone (n=15) from cadaveric human tibiae were used for the project. The cubes were scanned with µCT (Scanco Medical μ CT 35, Switzerland) using a nominal resolution of 20µm. The μ CT images were segmented and evaluated to obtain the outcomes for: bone volume fraction (BV/TV), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), trabecular separation (Tb.Sp), trabecular number (Nb.N). Subsequently, marrow was removed from the trabecular bone by immersing the specimen in a solution of soap and distilled water, then placing the cube in an ultrasonic bath for 60 min. A constant head permeameter was custom designed and built to measure the permeability. The time required to fill a 500 mL beaker with water was measured using a chronometer. Each cube was tested 5 times to determine precision. Permeability was then calculated using Darcy’s Law and an analysis of correlation between the permeability and the μ CT outcomes were conducted. RESULTS The mean permeability measured from the 15 cubes was 5.3e10 -6 +/- 3.0e10 -6 m 2 . The maximum standard deviation found for the five trials was 9.1e10 -8 m 2 (Fig.1). The correlations between μCT outcomes and permeability were 0.338, 0.002, 0.366, 0.590 for BV/TV, Tb.Sp., Tb.N., and Tb.Th. respectively; with the last one being statistically significant. Figure 1. The permeability of the cubic human bone specimen sample (n=15). The largest relative error found based on 5 trials was 1.42%. The figure is used to express the precision of the permeameter as well as the variability in permeability’s obtained through the samples. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS An experimental device to measure trabecular bone permeability was successfully developed. The low standard deviation of the permeability demonstrated the excellent precision of the permeameter. The high variability of the permeability among samples is consistent with the heterogeneity of the microarchitecture of the trabecular bone cubes. The largest correlation between permeability and a morphometric variable was found for Tb.Th.; h owever, it was not significant. The other μCT outcomes exhibited low correlation. These results suggest that permeability cannot be determined using only morphometric variables. However, the μCT images can be used to reconstruct the real architecture of the bone samples and perform more advance studies (i.e finite element modelling). Utilizing a permeameter that generates precise measurements combined with μCT images will offer information of sample specific permeability. This information will then provide new insights into the transport functions and biomechanics of trabecular bone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of undergraduate research in AlbertaSame topicBone health and osteoporosis researchFrench-language works237,207