Introduction: the construction of teenage pregnancy as a social problem
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This introductory chapter presents the three principal objectives of the book: firstly, to contribute to the comparative literature on welfare states by analysing the links between welfare state provision and teenage reproductive behaviour across a range of welfare countries; secondly, to examine the public policy responses to teenage parenthood among national models of welfare states; and thirdly, to present and discuss the construction of teenage pregnancy as a social problem in case studies drawn from various industrialised countries. It also discusses the comparative method used in this book as it draws on a small number of cases, limited to advanced industrialised societies with stable democratic systems: the UK (focusing on England), the US, New Zealand, France, the Canadian province of Québec, Italy, Denmark and Norway. Two transition countries, Russia and Poland, which emblematically illustrate the difficulties of transition from communism to economic liberalism and democracy, are also included.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it