Development of Specifications and Performance Criteria for Surface Preparation Based on Issues Related to Bond Strength
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In addition to the development of a satisfactory test procedure and recommendations to improve the overall quality of concrete repair works, the authors of this proposal intend to collaborate with various representatives from public agencies and from the industry to facilitate technological transfer. Presentations will be made in conferences and workshops in North America and Europe. At the end of the project, the results shall include two MSc theses and at least two papers in major journals, such as Concrete International or ACI Materials Journal. Also, the project should provide the basis towards a standard procedure for the evaluation of superficial cohesion of concrete, in relation with surface preparation and concrete removal techniques. Finally, recommendations and specifications could be incorporated in future versions of the ACI-ICRI Manual of Concrete Repairs as well as in DOT’s specifications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it