MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2486281233

[How far do clandestine abortion providers go in Africa?].

2005· article· en· W2486281233 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A Sepou, A Gaye, Alexandre Dumont

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbortionMedicinePregnancyIgnoranceObstetricsLabor inductionPopulationQuarter (Canadian coin)NursingEnvironmental healthPolitical scienceHistory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 28-year-old, gravida 2, para 2 was admitted to undergo abortion in the third quarter. The procedure consisting of mechanical induction of labor using plastic catheters was performed by a male nurse. The day after placement of the catheters the patient began labor and gave uneventful birth to female infant weighing 2900 grams. The procedure undertaken to destroy the fetus led to the birth of a normal healthy child. Mechanical induction after full-term pregnancy (rarely performed in our areas) is unwarranted if pregnancy is ongoing. Due to his ignorance of the late stage of pregnancy and of the potential consequences of the procedure, the male nurse had exposed the patient to risk of severe trauma. Although the outcome was favorable for the patient, action must be taken to control intermediate level health care workers whose practices can endanger the population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicGlobal Maternal and Child Health→French-language works237,207→