MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2486377756 · doi:10.1016/0967-0653(96)86865-7

10.1016/0967-0653(96)86865-7

2000· article· en· W2486377756 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hajime Okamoto, Andreas Macke, Markus Quante, E. Raschke

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPrecipitation Measurement and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadianceAspect ratio (aeronautics)Depolarization ratioMultipole expansionDiscrete dipole approximationIce cloudDipoleComputational physicsParticle (ecology)SPHERESSphericityPhysicsScatteringMaximaOpticsParticle sizeMolecular physicsGeometryChemistryMathematicsGeologyRadiative transfer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Backscattering by non-spherical ice particles at 94 GHz (3.2 mm wavelength) has been examined for hexagonal cylinders with aspect ratios ranging from 0.2 to 10, i.e. from plate-like to needle-like particles, as well as for combinations of hexagonal columns. Calculations have been performed using the Discrete Dipole Approximation (DDA). The results are of particular interest for the recently available 94 GHz cloud radar systems. In order to estimate the required number of dipoles to model a given particle, two empirical criteria have been formulated, which take into account the size and the non-sphericity of the particle. The origins of errors in the DDA method have been investigated. The effects of neglecting higher orders of multipole terms are much smaller than the errors due to the approximation of the particle shape by arranging dipoles on a cubic array. The backscattering properties of horizontally oriented ice particles have been calculated. Both the backscattered radiance and the depolarization ratio strongly depend on the particle size and aspect ratio. In general, the radiance increases with increasing particle size. However, resonance effects cause local minima in the backscattered radiances. The locations of these minima in terms of size and aspect ratio provide a relationship between these two parameters. Depolarization is strongest for needle-like particles and decreases with decreasing aspect ratio. In particular, the maximum depolarization is strongly related to the aspect ratio. Thus, observing local maxima of depolarization may provide an identification of the particle shape, which in turn may be converted to the size. The backscattering properties of combinations of hexagonal columns are similar to those for a single hexagonal column with a modified aspect ratio. It seems to be possible to treat these complex particles as simple hexagonal columns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0080.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9860.991

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.166
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knitSame topicPrecipitation Measurement and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207