Bibliographic record
Abstract
T he Frozen Deep is an appropriate end point to the series of performances considered here. Marking the transition from melancholic engagement to mournful closure, it contained, erased, and overwrote histories proposed by other performances. Like Zero, or Harlequin Light , it performed a disciplinary function, conditioning a specific public response through affective verisimilar performance, flattering press coverage, Dickens’s public persona, and the Queen’s presence. By staging a white Arctic utterly devoid of Inuit witnesses, The Frozen Deep erased the possibility of intercultural collaboration and racial liminality that arose in Qalasirssuaq’s theatrical and extratheatrical transformation aboard the Assistance and effectively obliterated the possibility of “playing” with race suggested by Charles Francis Hall’s actions while living among Inuit. Oral histories of contact with Franklin’s men—such as the stories preserved by Owwer and Innookpoozheejook’s mother-in-law—had no place in official commemorations of Franklin. In a sense, The Frozen Deep laid to rest not only Franklin and his men but also questions about racial and cultural difference, about competing epistemologies, and about the value of embodied historical knowledge. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.099 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".