MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2486492961 · doi:10.4000/books.puv.2358

Poésie, vidéo et nouveaux modes de diffusion chez les poètes contemporains du Québec : les Éditions de l’Écrou face aux nouvelles technologies

2016· book-chapter· fr· W2486492961 on OpenAlexaffabout
Paul Fraisse

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires de Vincennes eBooks · 2016
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsFrancophone University Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article ne prétend pas traiter la question de la place d’internet ou des nouveaux médias dans l’ensemble de la production poétique québécoise contemporaine, mais il limite l’observation de ce phénomène chez les poètes appartenant à une même maison d’édition : les Éditions de l’Écrou. Fondée en août 2009, cette maison d’édition, basée à Montréal, réunit dix poètes qui ont en commun la recherche d’une poésie qui parle à tous et qui se démarque de certaines pratiques conventionnelles de la r...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.858
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires de Vincennes eBooksSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207