MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Toward Autonomic DBMSs

2006· book-chapter· en· W2486562057 on OpenAlexaff
Patrick Martin, Wendy Powley, Min Zheng

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in database research (ADR) book series/Advances in database research series · 2006
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed systems and fault tolerance
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceHeuristicsControl reconfigurationKey (lock)DatabaseDatabase administratorDatabase transactionDistributed computingAutonomic computingSet (abstract data type)Class (philosophy)Greedy algorithmAlgorithmOperating systemCloud computingArtificial intelligenceProgramming languageEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter introduces autonomic computing as a means to automate the complex tuning, configuration, and optimization tasks that are currently the responsibility of the database administrator. We describe an algorithm called the dynamic reconfiguration algorithm (DRF) that can be implemented as part of an autonomic database management system (DBMS) to manage the DBMS buffer pools, which are a key resource in a DBMS. DRF is an iterative algorithm that uses greedy heuristics to find a reallocation that benefits a target transaction class. DRF uses the principle of goal-oriented resource management. We define and motivate the cost- estimate equations used in the algorithm and present the results of a set of experiments to investigate the performance of the algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.023
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.896
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0230.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0020.055
Open science0.0120.011
Research integrity0.0010.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in database research (ADR) book series/Advances in database research seriesSame topicDistributed systems and fault toleranceFrench-language works237,207