MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2486761235 · doi:10.1057/9780230241640_6

The Interest Group Hypothesis (The Issue Network)

2008· book-chapter· en· W2486761235 on OpenAlexaff
Kevin Quigley

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · 2008
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicState Capitalism and Financial Governance
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterdependenceGovernment (linguistics)BusinessChoseGovernment sectorService (business)Tertiary sector of the economyInterest groupIndustrial organizationMarketingEconomicsPolitical scienceEconomic growthPrivate sectorLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Each government had its own method of engaging with industry. The US government chose to tap into industry via trade associations and thereby secured a broad overview of the infrastructure. The UK government, in contrast, engaged directly with a select group of industry leaders and standardized (at a high level) the approach among them. Its effort to map sectoral interdependencies was ambitious, but flawed. In both countries, ultimately, larger players influenced the manner in which Y2K would be managed within their own sectors but they also had a responsibility to ensure continuity of service for their respective sectors and supply chains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooksSame topicState Capitalism and Financial GovernanceFrench-language works237,207