MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2486962012 · doi:10.1016/s2213-2600(16)30160-6

Factors associated with failure of emergency department management in children with acute moderate or severe asthma: a prospective, multicentre, cohort study

2016· article· en· W2486962012 on OpenAlexafffund
Francine M. Ducharme, Roger Zemek, Bhupendrasinh F Chauhan, Jocelyn Gravel, Dominic Chalut, Naveen Poonai, Marie‐Claude Guertin, Caroline Quach, Lucie Blondeau, Sophie Laberge

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Respiratory Medicine · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMontreal Children's HospitalUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of OttawaGeorge & Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare InnovationMcGill UniversityChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversité de MontréalLondon Health Sciences CentreCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCentre hospitalier régional universitaire de LilleCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCentre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-JustineMcGill University Health Centre
KeywordsMedicineEmergency departmentAsthmaProspective cohort studyOdds ratioPediatricsCohort studyBronchodilatorEmergency medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Respiratory MedicineSame topicAsthma and respiratory diseasesFrench-language works237,207