MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2487123657 · doi:10.7202/1073760ar

Les médicaments antirétroviraux et le VIH/sida

2020· article· fr· W2487123657 on OpenAlex
Stéphanie Argentier, Mylène Fernet, Joseph J. Lévy, Robert Bastien, René Fernet, Germain Trottier, Johanne Samson, Normand Lapointe, Joanne Otis, Marlène Rateau, Marie Harerimana, Antoine Bourdages, Marc Boucher

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontières · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversité de SherbrookeUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSidaHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)HumanitiesMedicinePhilosophyViral diseaseVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les traitements médicaux pour lutter contre le VIH/sida ont été limités pendant la plus grande partie de l’histoire de l’épidémie marquée par de nombreux décès. Depuis les années 1990, la mise au point de nouveaux médicaments antirétroviraux, sans constituer une cure, ont contribué chez plusieurs à l’amélioration de l’état de santé. Pour d’autres personnes vivant avec le VIH/sida, les effets indésirables des médicaments ont remis en question l’intérêt de ce traitement. Cet article explore, à partir de témoignages de personnes, hommes et femmes, vivant avec le VIH/sida à Montréal, les représentations contradictoires, oscillant entre scepticisme et espoir, entourant l’usage de ces médicaments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.785
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it