MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2487317218 · doi:10.1057/9781137453020_12

From Silence to Breath: An Irigarayan Study of the Representation of Motherhood in Modern Drama

2015· book-chapter· en· W2487317218 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yan Liu

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · 2015
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheatre and Performance Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCivilizationTabooSilenceSymbol (formal)Western cultureTotemDramaGender studiesPsychoanalysisOrder (exchange)InnocenceSociologyLiteratureHistoryPsychologyArtPhilosophyAestheticsAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mother is a cultural symbol in Western civilization, ‘a symbol so powerful that it shapes the dominant structures of Western thought’ (Lynn Huffer, Maternal Pasts, Feminist Futures , p. 7). At the Montreal Conference on ‘Women and Madness’ (May 1980), Luce Irigaray put forward the argument that Western civilization is founded on matricide. She says, ‘when Freud describes and theorizes, notably in Totem and Taboo , the murder of the father as founding the primal horde, he forgets a more archaic murder, that of the mother, necessitated by the establishment of a certain order in the polis’ (‘The Bodily Encounter with the Mother’, p. 36). In an interview with Thérèse Dumonchel and Marie-Madeleine Raoult soon afterwards, Irigaray reiterates this point: ‘the whole of our Western culture is based upon the murder of the mother (‘Women-Mothers, the Silent Substratum of the Social Order’, p. 47). Matricide, the killing of the mother to ensure the implementation of masculine orders, lies at the foundation of Western civilization. This contention should be understood more culturally than literally. The killing does not signify just the elimination of the mother as a physical existence, but above all the removal of the mother from social responsibilities, the silencing of the mother’s speech, and the repression of the mother’s desires. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0150.041
Scholarly communication0.0140.013
Open science0.0030.009
Research integrity0.0040.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooksSame topicTheatre and Performance StudiesFrench-language works237,207