Hybridity, Migration, and Transnational Relations: Re-thinking Canadian Pentecostalism from a Latina/o Perspective
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the context of Canada, migration is one of those factors that accounts for the growth of Pentecostalism. This chapter argues that issues of immigration and multiculturalism need to be interrogated in light of the historical legacy of racism in Canada. It views notions of empire, conquest, and cultural invasion as lenses through which to understand patterns of migration and the phenomena of globalization. The chapter shows that as Latina/o-Canadian communities enter and ‘incorporate’ into the Canadian context, forging new identities, they are profoundly changed. Overall, it argues that Latina/o- Canadian Pentecostal (LCP) cannot be examined outside the larger process of settlement and incorporation into the Canadian cultural and social context of Latinas/os. The issues involved in the complex process of incorporation, identity formation, and reconfiguration are found among those Latina/o-Canadians who are Pentecostal believers. Keywords:Canadian pentecostalism; immigration; Latina/o- Canadian Pentecostal (LCP) communities; multiculturalism; Pentecostal transnational relations
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".