MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Expressing Musical Features, Class Labels, Ontologies, and Metadata Using ACE XML 2.0

2012· book-chapter· en· W2487843115 on OpenAlexaff
Cory McKay, Ichiro Fujinaga

Bibliographic record

VenueIGI Global eBooks · 2012
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMusic and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsMarianopolis CollegeMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceXMLMetadataClass (philosophy)Domain (mathematical analysis)World Wide WebContext (archaeology)Efficient XML InterchangeInformation retrievalSet (abstract data type)XML Schema EditorXML frameworkProgramming languageArtificial intelligenceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter includes a critical review of existing file formats that have been used in MIR research. This is followed by a set of design priorities that are proposed for use in developing new formats and improving existing ones. The details of the ACE XML specification are then described in this context. Finally, research priorities for the future are discussed, as well as possible uses for ACE XML outside the specific domain of MIR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.703
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIGI Global eBooksSame topicMusic and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207