MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Acting on Attachments: Intimate Witness to State Violence in the Philippines

2012· book-chapter· en· W2487922155 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Geraldine Pratt

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Minnesota Press eBooks · 2012
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWitnessState (computer science)InvisibilityPoliticsPolitical scienceGovernment (linguistics)CriminologyHuman rightsGender studiesEconomic growthSociologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter examines the obliviousness of Canadians in witnessing and attaching to the violence associated with the Live-In Caregiver Program (LCP), as well as government programs in the Philippines. Many Canadians fail to see the violence of these state policies despite often living close to women who are experiencing it. The chapter addresses a site of invisibility that lies in the Philippines. It invites Canadians to witness violence in the Philippines by highlighting an event in November 2006 when Filipino Canadian activists from the Kalayaan Centre in Vancouver assembled a team of Canadians to conduct a fact-finding mission in the Philippines. The focus of the mission was the state-sanctioned murders since 2001 of many human rights workers and members of the political left in the Philippines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.929

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Minnesota Press eBooksSame topicCanadian Policy and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207