MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2487995875 · doi:10.1109/biorob.2016.7523626

Steps toward knowledgeable neuroprostheses

2016· article· en· W2487995875 on OpenAlexaff
Patrick M. Pilarski, Craig Sherstan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceHuman–computer interactionWork (physics)Sensory systemNeuroprostheticsControl (management)Artificial intelligenceNeuroscienceEngineeringPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Advanced neuroprosthetic devices demonstrate an impressive capacity for both actuation and sensation, providing numerous controllable degrees of freedom and reportable sensory percepts. When linked to the human body by way of invasive and non-invasive brain-body-machine interfaces, neuroprostheses promise to greatly improve life for users by extending their capacity to engage with and interpret the world around them. In this work, we demonstrate how a prosthetic device can build up diverse knowledge during its ongoing operation so as to better support its user. Specifically, we show that a device can learn and update more than 18k different temporally extended predictions per second about all aspects of a sensorimotor data stream, significantly extending past work on real-time knowledge acquisition during prosthetic control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207