MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2488009965 · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316152478.015

Atkinson, Stroud and Cyr<i>v</i>. Canada

2001· article· en· W2488009965 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Law Reports · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Law and Aviation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternational Covenant on Civil and Political RightsCovenantJurisdictionLawTreatyEntitlement (fair division)Political scienceHuman rightsCompensation (psychology)Scope (computer science)War crimePoliticsNationalityInternational lawPrisoners of warWorld War IIInternational human rights lawRight to propertyEconomicsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human rights — International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966 — Scope ratione materiae and ratione temporis — Prisoners of war — Canadian servicemen captured by Japan in Second World War — Whether Canada had violated Covenant in its treatment of claims to compensation — Discrimination International tribunals — United Nations Human Rights Committee — Jurisdiction — Temporal jurisdiction — Domestic remedies rule 210 War and armed conflict — Prisoners of war — Entitlement to compensation for unlawful treatment — Peace Treaty with Japan

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score0.545

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Law ReportsSame topicInternational Law and AviationFrench-language works237,207