Contrôle de gestion et culture nationale: un essai d'adaptation dans le contexte tunisien
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The issues of adaptation of management control to the social and cultural characteristics of various countries are far from being fully resolved. This is the assumption of this article in its mission to focus on national differences. This work has 3 objectives. The first is to identify the cultural foundations, coming from North American society, of management control. The second is to show how Tunisian cultural values are inadequate to the American model of management control. The third objective is to provide some guidelines for the adaptation of management control to the national culture of Tunisia. From the Tunisian cultural configuration and the information gathered through interviews, we recommend that adaptation efforts be directed to the following 3 areas: first, gradually changing perceptions while moving closer to a culture of competitiveness; then, a development of individual performance while retaining a portion of collectivism; finally, a participatory development while retaining an element of hierarchy. [PUB ABSTRACT]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it