MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sofrimento nos laços pais-filhos: práticas educativas fundadas na mentalização na proteção da infância

2016· article· pt· W2488259167 on OpenAlexaff
Miguel M. Terradas, Julie Achim

Bibliographic record

VenueEstilos da Clinica · 2016
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychology and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyDevelopmental psychologyHumanitiesMolecular biologyBiologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A maioria das crianças e dos adolescentes que vivem sob a proteção da juventude viveram traumas complexos ligados à negligência, aos maus tratos e às diversas formas de abusos. Sugerimos que esses jovens, bem como seus pais, apresentam dificuldades quanto à capacidade de mentalização e demonstram um funcionamento psíquico característico dos modos de pensar pré-mentalizantes. Este artigo apresenta a operacionalização dos diferentes modos de pensar (teleológico, de equivalência psíquica e fictício). São apresentados os princípios subjacentes a um programa de intervenção baseado na mentalização que poderão ser utilizados pelos educadores que trabalham com crianças e adolescentes em situação de vulnerabilidade.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.073

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.155
GPT teacher head0.475
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEstilos da ClinicaSame topicPsychology and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207