Design and Application of a Rock Breaking Experimental Device With Rotary Percussion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rotary impact drilling technology is one of the effective speed-up methods in drilling deep well. The dynamics model of the impact process and rock breaking shows that the peak value of the impact load is affected by the spring compression, and the impact time increases with the piston’s mass increasing. The stress wave in rock is proportionate to the impact load. A new rock broken experiment device with rotary impact was designed, and the device can measure and adjust the WOB, rotary rate, impact load and frequency, also has the ability of rock breaking for conventional and rotary percussion drilling. The rock breaking experiments show that the rotary percussion drilling technology can improve the rate of penetration of PDC bit significantly; increasing the value of impact load can improve the ROP significantly. When different rotary percussion drilling tools used in different formations, optimizing the WOB and rotary rate for fast drilling is very necessary. The influence of the rotary impact drilling on the rock broken can be studied by the experiment device, which is helpful for the design and optimization of the percussion tools.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".