MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2488600916 · doi:10.1080/17474124.2016.1215912

Ustekinumab for the treatment of Crohn’s disease

2016· review· en· W2488600916 on OpenAlexaff
Tawnya Hansen, Laura E. Targownik

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology · 2016
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUstekinumabMedicinePsoriatic arthritisCrohn's diseasePsoriasisInterleukin 23Clinical trialRandomized controlled trialInternal medicineDiseaseDermatologyAdalimumabInterleukin 17Inflammation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Ustekinumab is a human monoclonal antibody directed against the shared p40 subunit of interleukins 12 and 23. Ustekinumab is currently approved for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, and is being evaluated in Crohn's disease (CD). AREAS COVERED: The first evidence supporting the efficacy of ustekinumab in the treatment of moderate to severe CD was published in 2008. Results from subsequent phase II and phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown promising data on the clinical efficacy of induction and remission of moderate to severe CD. These data and the safety profile of ustekinumab will be reviewed. Expert commentary: As a significant proportion of individuals with CD have ongoing symptoms and inflammation despite existing therapies, there is a clinical need for new agents like ustekinumab directed at different targets on the inflammatory pathway. Looking forward, more studies are needed to evaluate dosing escalation or de-escalation in addition to timing of therapy switches. In addition, further data is required to gauge the comparative effectiveness of ustekinumab to the biologic agents that are currently used in the treatment of CD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.949
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Review of Gastroenterology & HepatologySame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207