MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Funerary Program of the Tupinambá in Araruama, RJ - Bananeiras Site.

2003· article· pt· W2488669543 on OpenAlex
Angela Buarque, Cláudia Rodrigues-Carvalho, Elizabeth Christina da Silva

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista do Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia · 2003
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O objetivo deste artigo é apresentar informações significativas sobre um sepultamento presente no sítio arqueológico Bananeiras, Araruama, RJ, relacionado à ocupação Tupinambá. Destaca-se a preservação de remanescentes esqueléticos, os quais, embora friáveis, permitiram a realização de análises osteológicas macroscópicas, revelando um sepultamento primário de indivíduo do sexo feminino, sem sinais patológicos evidentes, à exceção de lesões cariosas compatíveis com a estratégia de subsistência postulada para o grupo a que pertenceu. A comparação dos dados procedentes de outros sítios pesquisados nos permite lançar a hipótese da existência de um programa funerário uniforme na região, caracterizado pela presença de uma funerária com tampa e tigelas pintadas associadas. Apesar de confirmado o enterramento primário em uma, a ausência de vestígios esqueléticos passíveis de análise em sítios semelhantes não permite estabelecer esta prática como exclusiva na região.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.797
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it