MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2488669681 · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-55243-3_8

Reflecting on the Arts in Urban Schools

2016· book-chapter· en· W2488669681 on OpenAlexaff
Rubén Gaztambide‐Fernández, Chandni Desai, Traci L. Scheepstra

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooks · 2016
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt Education and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe artsSocial justiceEquity (law)SociologyPoliticsContext (archaeology)PedagogyEconomic JusticePolitical sciencePublic relationsSocial scienceGeographyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this chapter, the authors reflect on their experiences teaching a course in which teacher candidates explored how arts integration might play a role in teaching for equity and social justice. The authors address: the theory and politics behind the course design—how it sought to re-frame “the arts” and re-think the notion of the urban; how the course evolved over time in response to institutional changes and students’ expectations; and the challenges and opportunities of doing social justice work through the arts as well as approaching the arts through a social justice lens in the context of urban schools.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.564
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooksSame topicArt Education and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207