MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2488670390 · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316152485.019

United Mexican States <i>v</i>. Metalclad Corporation (Attorney-General of Canada and la Procureure Générale du Québec, Intervenors)

2002· article· en· W2488670390 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Law Reports · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInternational Arbitration and Investment Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExpropriationArbitrationAnnulmentTribunalLawInternational arbitrationPolitical scienceCompulsory arbitrationCorporationFree trade agreementTransparency (behavior)Scope (computer science)BusinessEconomicsFree tradeInternational trade

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arbitration — International commercial arbitration — Definition — Powers of review for courts of seat of arbitration — Decision on matter outside scope of arbitration agreement — North American Free Trade Agreement, Chapter 11 — Limits — No power for arbitration tribunal to decide issues arising under other NAFTA provisions — Whether powers of court include review for patently unreasonable error — Effect of procedure in arbitration rules — Procedure — ICSID arbitration — Additional Facility Rules — Amendment of claim — Partial annulment of award — Effect Economics, trade and finance — Investment protection — North American Free Trade Agreement, Chapter 11 — Scope — Arbitral provisions — Article 1105 — International minimum standard — Fair and equitable treatment of investment — Requirement of transparency — Whether arising under Article 1105 Expropriation — Definition — North American Free Trade Agreement, Article 1110 — Conduct tantamount to expropriation — Distinction between expropriation and regulation — The law of British Columbia

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.460
Threshold uncertainty score0.926

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0780.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Law ReportsSame topicInternational Arbitration and Investment LawFrench-language works237,207