MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2488732770 · doi:10.1057/9780333985328_3

Byrnes, Bevin and the Temporary Settlement, 1946

2000· book-chapter· en· W2488732770 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Saul Kelly

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · 2000
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicItalian Fascism and Post-war Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSettlement (finance)Political scienceQuarter (Canadian coin)Cold warPower (physics)Order (exchange)Foreign policyEconomic historyPosition (finance)Political economyPoliticsHistoryLawSociologyEconomicsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It was clear from the London and Moscow Conferences that the success of Bevin's policy on the Italian colonies depended upon American support and whether an Anglo‐American policy could be fashioned to help avoid any undermining of Britain's position in the eastern Mediterranean and the Middle East, and thereby its standing as a great power. In the first quarter of 1946 this appeared possible in the wake of a general stiffening of the American stance towards the Soviet Union. It was the Iranian crisis which led the Truman Administration to pursue a more confrontational policy towards the Soviets in order, at this stage, to reach agreements satisfactory to US interests rather than as part of a Cold War strategy. This can be seen in the American attitude towards the Soviet claim to Tripolitania and the refashioning of American policy on the Italian colonies. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.092

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.012
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooksSame topicItalian Fascism and Post-war SocietyFrench-language works237,207