Bibliographic record
Abstract
Agglutination and hemolytic incompatibilities in cats were first reported in the early 20th century in New York City. Out of 40 cats, tube crossmatches identified two cats with strong alloagglutinins that were likely type B cats. Crossmatch incompatibility between two type B cats was reported, as were anti-B antibodies at low titer in type B and type AB cats. These could represent non-AB system incompatibilities or subgroups of type B. Transfusion of type B or AB blood to a type A cat might result in a mild acute reaction or delayed hemolysis from the anti-B activity. In the author's opinion, it is malpractice to perform a blood transfusion in a cat without a compatibility test of some sort, and the admonition of "B careful" should be remembered whenever performing a feline transfusion. Compatibility testing must be performed by serologic methods, which in increasing order of precision are crossmatching, antibody screening, and blood typing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.053 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".