MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2489175296 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b05836

Interfacial Electronic Structure in Graded Shell Nanocrystals Dictates Their Performance for Optical Gain

2016· article· en· W2489175296 on OpenAlexafffund
Brenna Walsh, Jonathan I. Saari, Michael Krause, Timothy G. Mack, Robert Nick, Seth Coe‐Sullivan, Patanjali Kambhampati

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicQuantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
KeywordsMaterials sciencePhotoluminescenceExcitonSpectroscopyNanocrystalFemtosecondBiexcitonOptoelectronicsElectronic structureNanotechnologyChemical physicsLaserOpticsChemistryCondensed matter physicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The interface of semiconductor nanocrystals is a critical factor for determining their performance in light emissive applications. Traditional nanocrystals have an abrupt termination of the core/shell interface. Recent synthetic work has focused upon developing graded core/shell interfaces via alloying. Here, we employ femtosecond state-resolved pump/probe spectroscopy, temperature-dependent photoluminescence spectroscopy, and a microscopic theory of interfacial charge trapping to reveal the manner in which a graded interface controls the main optical gain metrics: threshold, bandwidth, and lifetime in the CdSe/Cd,Zn,S core/shell system. Photoluminescence spectroscopy in conjunction with semiclassical electron transfer theory reveals the absence of an interfacial electronic state. This absence of a surface/interfacial state is unique to these nanocrystals with a graded shell structure, enabling trap free performance. Excitonic state-resolved pump/probe spectroscopy reveals that the higher excitons do not have the same symmetries as spherical CdSe nanocrystals, thereby enabling increased bandwidth. These pump/probe experiments further reveal the unique electronic structure of the band-edge biexciton which enables single exciton gain in these nanocrystal systems. Finally, the long gain lifetimes are discussed in light of the absence of a surface/interfacial electronic state. These experiments provide the first direct view of how interfacial electronic structure can be probed and understood so as to optimize their performance for light emission and optical gain for the metrics of threshold, bandwidth, and lifetime.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry CSame topicQuantum Dots Synthesis And PropertiesFrench-language works237,207