MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2489256155 · doi:10.1016/j.oooo.2016.07.004

Diagnostic validity of clinical protocols to assess temporomandibular disk displacement disorders: a meta-analysis

2016· review· en· W2489256155 on OpenAlexaff
Yasmine Mendes Pupo, Letícia Lopes Quirino Pantoja, Flavia Fusco Veiga, José Stechman‐Neto, Liete Figueiredo Zwir, Paulo Vítor Farago, Graziela De Luca Canto, André Luís Porporatti

Bibliographic record

VenueOral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology · 2016
Typereview
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicTemporomandibular Joint Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResearch Diagnostic CriteriaMedicineMeta-analysisTemporomandibular jointProtocol (science)MEDLINEMagnetic resonance imagingCochrane LibraryDiagnostic accuracyMedical physicsRadiologyDentistryPathologyAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.033
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.077
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.177

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0330.077
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.029
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.469
GPT teacher head0.560
Teacher spread0.091 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueOral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology and Oral RadiologySame topicTemporomandibular Joint DisordersFrench-language works237,207