Bibliographic record
Abstract
The sleep of reason produces monsters . F. Goya, Los Caprichos (1799) Ideal self-constituting What we need is a metaphysics of Europe's self-constituting . What we do not need is a rationalization of ‘European integration’. Still less should we act as apologists of the current incoherent state of the public realms of Europe, a state of affairs which is an unwilled and irrational outcome of countless coordinated and uncoordinated acts and events – a leviathan of shreds and patches. ‘European Union’ is an Ungeheuer which is an Unganze . There was Europe – as place, as subjectivity, as potentiality – before there were the social systems (‘states’) which the usual conception of ‘European integration’ presupposes. The true self-constituting of the people and the peoples of Europe requires a new concept ( Begriff) of their perennial unity, not merely an explanation of a particular negating of their recent disunity. Europe – as place, as subjectivity, as potentiality – is not the natural product of organic processes. It is a product of, and in, consciousness. Societies constitute themselves ideally by imagining collectively their identity, their unity and their purpose. The ideal self-constituting of a society is a process of collective thinking, embracing every kind of thinking, theoretical and practical, disinterested and subjective, rational and irrational.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.050 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".