Rheology of PP/PP-<i>g</i>-MA and PP/PP-<i>g</i>-AA Blends and Incidence on Orientation and Crystalline Structure of Their Cast Films
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The intrinsic hydrophobic character of polypropylene limits its performance in many porous membrane applications. This can be improved by hydrophilic modification of the film surface through blending with hydrophilic polymers. For producing the precursor films and, consequently, microporous membranes with the appropriate crystalline lamellar morphology, the polypropylene chains should preserve their elongated form to serve as initial nuclei for the later development of lamellar crystals. The relaxation time of the chains is the most important factor for this stage. Commercial maleic anhydride and acrylic acid grafted polypropylenes were melt blended with a polypropylene at different weight ratios. The results showed that the modifiers lowered the crystalline orientation of the blends as compared to neat polypropylene films. The effect of the modifier on the melt relaxation spectra of the blends was investigated, and a linear relationship was found between the characteristic relaxation time of the blends and their crystalline orientation function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".